In leagues that suit his game and other leagues that don’t.

The current narrative is that any player who leaves Manchester United will shine, walk on air, and win the Ballon d’Or, and that the reason is always Manchester United!

This narrative is not true and has no clear context. It is simply a simplistic narrative.

Hoyland scored a goal today in his first game with Napoli, so God willing, Hoyland will improve after leaving United!

Even though Hoiland contributed 17 goals in his first season with United

and scored 5 goals in the Champions League in 6 games, he basically came from Atlanta with only 12 goals!

The same can be said about Sancho, who contributed 7 goals in 31 Premier League games with Chelsea,

compared to 9 goals in 26 Premier League games in his two seasons with United before that, but he improved after leaving United.

When Rashford contributed 9 goals with Aston Villa, his situation improved after leaving United, even though Marco Asensio left Paris and

went to Aston Villa at the same time and also contributed 9 goals, but we don’t say the problem is in Paris because it doesn’t bring in Richie like United!

What I want to say is that there are dozens of criteria we can talk about and use to identify the problem, such as leagues that suit his style

and leagues that don’t, a criterion called adaptation, a criterion called playing style, a criterion called whether my teammates suit me or not, and the level of pressure that I, as a player, cannot bear!

United is in trouble and is not stable administratively or technically.

That is a fact and we all know it, but the problem is always with United, as if the rest of the world’s teams have no problems.

That is nonsense and makes no sense.Manchester United

Yes, Manchester United is suffering from administrative and technical problems and a lack of stability, and this is well known.

Many people these days repeat the superficial refrain that:

“Any player who leaves Manchester United suddenly shines as if the club was holding him back!

” The truth is that this statement is pure speculation, not based on statistics or real context. Let’s put things in order:

1. Ramos Hoiland:

• With Atlanta: Contributed to 12 goals.

• With Manchester United (his first season): Contributed to 17 goals, including 5 goals in the Champions League in 6 games.

• In other words, his numbers improved with United, but because he scored a goal in his first game against Napoli, people suddenly said that “his situation had changed”!

2. Jadon Sancho:

• With United: 9 contributions in one season (26 games).

• With Chelsea: 7 contributions in 31 games.

• The difference is very slight, and it does not mean that he was reborn as soon as he left.

3. Marcus Rashford:

• He contributed 9 goals with Aston Villa, but Marco Asensio, when he left Paris Saint-Germain for Aston Villa, contributed the same number (9 goals), and no one came out to say that Paris “destroys players”!

⚽️ Key point:

Players are affected by many factors, including:

• The style of play and how well it suits their abilities.

• The team’s tactical system.

• The nature of their teammates and how well they get along with them.

• Media and fan pressure (and United is hell in this regard).

• Differences between leagues in terms of strength, pressure, and pace.

Conclusion:

Yes, Manchester United suffers from administrative and technical problems and a lack of stability, and this is well known.

But turning every player’s story into a narrative called “United is the reason” is simply futile and naive analysis.

A player’s success at one club and failure at another has many reasons and does not necessarily mean that the previous club was the problem.

playerszone